Australia's government has published draft rules that would let social media users pick their default feed: posts recommended by an algorithm, or only the friends and creators they follow. The measure, called My Feed, My Way, was announced on 8 September 2026, and Instagram's head, Adam Mosseri, has since made the case against feeds without recommendations.
This post sets out what the proposal says, where it stands, how Instagram responded and what it could mean for creators and the brands that work with them.
My Feed, My Way is part of draft legislation for a Digital Duty of Care, released by Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and Communications Minister Anika Wells for targeted consultation.
A notification to every user Social media platforms would have to tell new and existing users that they have a choice over their default feed
Two options Users could opt in to recommendations personalised by an algorithm, or opt out and see only the friends and creators they follow
Who gets it Wells said Australians over the age of 16 would be able to opt in or out of the algorithm easily
Penalties Platforms that do not comply could face penalties of up to $109.2 million, with the eSafety Commissioner in charge of enforcement
The government says it will introduce the legislation to Parliament this year. Until then it is a draft, and the detail may change after consultation. Albanese said: "This is not about giving government control, it is about giving people control."
Tubefilter reports that Mosseri said only a "very vocal minority" want a reverse-chronological feed. He argued that users would be swamped by brand content, because brands post more often than friends and creators, and that feeds without recommendations would lead people to use the app less, cutting reach and Instagram's revenue. Tubefilter notes that Mosseri did not say directly that he was responding to the Australian plan.
The idea is not new. Tubefilter points out that the EU's Digital Services Act already requires platforms to let users switch to a feed that is not recommended, and that regulators there complained platforms did not make opting out easy enough.
If people can switch off recommendations, a creator's reach in that feed depends on who already follows them. Discovery through recommended posts would matter less for those users, and a loyal following would matter more.
Nothing changes yet, and many people may never switch. But the sensible response is the same either way: give people reasons to follow you, not only to watch one post. Our guide to growing your Instagram following organically covers the basics, and our creator management team works with talent on building an audience that sticks.
Mosseri's point cuts both ways for brands. A follow-only feed could fill up with brand accounts, but a brand post would only reach people who chose to follow that brand. Creators with engaged followers offer another route into those feeds.
That makes audience quality worth checking before a booking, as the YouTube creator search tool test also showed. For help planning content with creators, see our creator and talent campaigns page or our guide to UGC for brands.
FAQ
No. It is draft legislation released for targeted consultation on 8 September 2026. The government says it will introduce it to Parliament this year.
No. Platforms would have to offer a choice. Users could keep algorithm-recommended posts or opt out and see only the friends and creators they follow.
Yes. The EU's Digital Services Act requires platforms to let users switch to a feed that is not based on recommendations, according to Tubefilter.
Tell us about your work, your channels and your audience.
Journal
More from the journal
Read all







